Lexical Stratigraphy and Turkicization in the Xiongnu: An Iranian Prestige Layer in Chinese Transcriptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/9xax3g83Keywords:
Xiongnu; language contact; linguistic stratum; language shift.Abstract
The Chinese historiographic record preserves ethnonyms, titles, personal names, and a modest set of glosses that later scholarship has treated as the principal basis for assigning a “Xiongnu language.” This paper reexamines this long-standing Xiongnu language problem by treating the Chinese-recorded information as a stratified lexical record rather than as evidence for a single stable vernacular. Instead of assigning the material to one language family, the analysis focuses on the internal distribution of proposed etymological layers and their sociolinguistic implications. A clear asymmetry emerges: Iranian-associated items cluster in early sources and are largely confined to institutional and pastoral vocabulary, whereas Turkic-associated items appear across both early and later layers and span a broader range of semantic domains. This pattern is most consistent with an early Iranian prestige or contact layer progressively assimilated within a Turkic-dominant communicative environment during the Xiongnu imperial period. The findings suggest that apparent support for competing single-family hypotheses reflects stratification within a small, transmitted corpus rather than mutually exclusive identifications.
Downloads
References
[1] Di Cosmo N. Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511967
[2] Baxter W H, Sagart L. Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001
[3] Savelyev A, Jeong C. Early nomads of the Eastern Steppe and their tentative connections in the West. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 2020, 2: e20. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2020.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2020.18
[4] Jeong C, Wang K, Wilkin S, et al. A dynamic 6,000-year genetic history of Eurasia’s Eastern Steppe. Cell, 2020, 183(4): 890-904.e29. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.015
[5] Lee J, Miller B K, Bayarsaikhan J, et al. Genetic population structure of the Xiongnu Empire at imperial and local scales. Science Advances, 2023, 9(15): eadf3904. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adf3904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adf3904
[6] Rogers L L, Kaestle F A. Analysis of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup frequencies in the population of the slab burial mortuary culture of Mongolia (ca. 1100–300 BCE). American Journal of Biological Anthropology, 2022, 177(4): 644-657. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.24478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24478
[7] Dybo A V. Lingvističeskije kontakty rannix tjurkov. Leksičeskij fond. Pratjurkskij period [Linguistic contacts of the early Turks. Lexical stock. The Proto-Turkic period]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura, 2007.
[8] Fan Ye. Hou Hanshu. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju, 1965.
[9] Sima Qian. Shiji (Annotated with traditional commentaries). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju, 1959.
[10] Wei L, Li H. About the names of the Chanyu family and the branch tribes of the Xiongnu. In: Xu D, Fu J (Eds.), Language Contact and Language Variation, pp. 69-96. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








