How People Describe Their Mystical Experiences: Analyzing Language, Narrative, and Digital Expression

Authors

  • Daniel Zhu St Andrew’s School, Middletown, Delaware, The United States of America

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/01rs4b13

Keywords:

Mystical experiences; Digital religion; Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA); VADER sentiment analysis.

Abstract

This study investigates how mystical experiences are articulated in digital environments, especially in religion-focused communities (“subreddits”) on Reddit, a popular social media platform. Classical theorists like William James argued that mystical experiences resist linguistic expression; in other words, according to the traditional scholarly view, these phenomena are inherently “ineffable.” However, this study finds that social media users share detailed narratives of their mystical experiences through a blend of metaphor, emotion, and storytelling. Using the Reddit API, data are retrieved from five subreddits representing different faiths and religious emphases: r/religion, r/Christianity, r/spirituality, r/Buddhism, and r/DebateAnAtheist. Mixed-method analyses were then conducted, combining computational text analysis, including VADER sentiment analysis and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling, with qualitative techniques, including narrative and cultural analysis. In addition to the abundance of effable expression of mystical experience, it is also revealed that community identity significantly shapes how mystical experiences are framed. For instance, r/Buddhism emphasizes meditative mechanics and doctrine; r/Christianity mostly relies on language derived from the Scripture and the Church; r/DebateAnAtheist focuses almost exclusively on epistemology and materialist inquiry with little experiential description. Thus, the study argues that “ineffability” may be a product of social environment rather than an inherent quality of the experience. When digital anonymity and community-specific “scripts” provide individuals an opportunity to escape the confines of the traditional social environment, their subjective religious encounters are translated into detailed, though socially negotiated, narratives. This study demonstrates that digital environments, such as social media, are a crucial platform where individuals can seek meaning, validation, and identity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. Longmans, Green & Co.

[2] Reddy, W. M. (2001). The navigation of feeling: A framework for the history of emotions. Cambridge University Press.

[3] Katz, S. T. (1978). Language, epistemology, and mysticism. In S. T. Katz (Ed.), Mysticism and philosophical analysis (pp. 22–74). Oxford University Press.

[4] Proudfoot, W. (1985). Religious experience. University of California Press.

[5] Stace, W. T. (1960). Mysticism and philosophy. Macmillan.

[6] Campbell, H. A. (2013). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Routledge.

[7] Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326.

[8] Luhrmann, T. M. (2012). When God talks back: Understanding the American evangelical relationship with God. Knopf.

[9] Taves, A. (2009). Religious experience reconsidered: A building-block approach to the study of religion and other special things. Princeton University Press.

Downloads

Published

02-07-2026

How to Cite

Zhu , D. (2026). How People Describe Their Mystical Experiences: Analyzing Language, Narrative, and Digital Expression. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 16, 164-172. https://doi.org/10.62051/01rs4b13