AI-Empowered English Speaking Teaching and Learning: A Scoping Review of Chinese Core Journal Studies (2022–2026)

Authors

  • Jiayu Wu The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/bdwbk164

Keywords:

artificial intelligence; English language teaching; human-AI collaboration; learner agency; intelligent assessment; ethical governance.

Abstract

Despite rapid growth in research on generative AI in EFL speaking instruction, the thematic structure and evidence gaps of this body of research have not been systematically mapped. This scoping review follows PRISMA-ScR guidelines to map AI-empowered English speaking research in Chinese core journals indexed in CNKI from 2022 to March 2026. Two independent researchers screened the literature (Cohen’s κ = 0.85), yielding 33 eligible studies. Findings show that the field has grown substantially since 2024, shifting from tool-oriented discussions to systemic analyses across five themes: pedagogical restructuring, learner agency, dynamic assessment, teacher AI literacy, and ethical governance. Yet proficiency-stratified analysis, longitudinal evidence, assessment fairness, and comparative research on domestic Chinese and global LLMs remain underdeveloped. By providing the first systematic mapping of this field, the review demonstrates how China's exam culture, in which high-stakes assessment pressure shapes AI integration in distinctive ways, interacts with AI+Education policy and the domestic LLM ecosystem to extend CALL and SLA scholarship beyond Western-centered settings. Priority should be given to longitudinal and proficiency-stratified designs, integrated teaching-learning-assessment cycles, and localized LLM governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Jiao, J., & Chen, T. (2023). Large language models enhanced ESL/EFL teaching: Four cases. TEFLE, (2), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.20139/j.issn.1001-5795.2023.02.002

[2] Xu, J., & Zhao, C. (2024). The roles of large language models in English language teaching. Foreign Language Education in China, 7(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.20083/j.cnki.fleic.2024.01.003

[3] Liu, B., Hu, J., Liu, M., Li, X., Zou, K., & Wei, M. (2025). AI-empowered integration of teaching-learning-assessment in English listening and speaking: Model, strategies, and empirical validation. Journal of China Examinations, (1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.19360/j.cnki.11-3303/g4.2025.01.005

[4] Wang, Q., & Xiao, S. (2025). The dilemmas and reform paths to foreign language teacher education in the era of artificial intelligence. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 46(4), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.16482/j.sdwy37-1026.2025-04-007

[5] Dong, H. (2024). Communication ethical risks and mitigation strategies in human-machine dialogue in the era of generative artificial intelligence: A perspective from German critical theory. Yuejiang Academic Journal, (1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.13878/j.cnki.yjxk.20231102.004

[6] British Council. (2024). English in numbers. British Council.

[7] Ministry of Education of China. (2026). Action plan for "AI + education". Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China.

[8] Xiang, R., & Li, D. (2024). The practical exploration of promoting high-quality English teaching in senior high school with artificial intelligence. China Journal of Education, (S1), 170–173.

[9] Zhong, M. (2025). Building an oral practice model for English texts with AI intelligent characters based on English textbooks. Teaching and Administration, (11), 55–58.

[10] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

[11] Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.

[12] Fang, F., & Wu, Q. (2025). Exploring translanguaging practice and learner agency in English-medium instruction class in the era of generative artificial intelligence. Foreign Language Education in China, 8(4), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.20083/j.cnki.fleic.2025.0034

[13] Jia, Y. (2024). Integrating translation project management platforms with generative AI technologies: An investigation into the translation process through human-machine interaction. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 56(6), 937–949. https://doi.org/10.19923/j.cnki.fltr.2024.06.012

[14] García, O., & Li Wei. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765

[15] Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.

[16] Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.

[17] Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.

[18] Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003

[19] Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford University Press.

[20] Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125

[21] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

[22] Jin, Y., & Sun, F. (2025). The effect of GAI-assisted foreign language speaking practice on foreign language speaking enjoyment: An intervention study. Foreign Language Education in China, 8(3), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.20083/j.cnki.fleic.2025.0031

[23] Wu, L. (2025). An empirical research on empowering the teaching of oral English with large language models. Modern Educational Technology, 35(10), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2025.10.004

[24] Wang, C., Peng, L., & Jiang, X. (2026). An action research of the effectiveness of English teaching with AI support in universities. Foreign Languages and Literature, 42(1), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.26922/j.cnki.waiguoyuwen.2026.01.017

[25] Yi, N. (2025). A study on the effectiveness of generative artificial intelligence in oral English learning in military academies. Journal of Military Higher Education Research, 48(3), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2097-4043.2025.03.008

[26] Wu, J., Zhou, W., & Cao, C. (2024). An empirical study on empowering oral teaching with AIGC. China Educational Technology, (4), 105–111.

[27] Liu, F. (2025). Artificial intelligence empowers the cultural inheritance of English grammar teaching in senior high schools. China Journal of Education, (S1), 15–17.

[28] Pan, M., & Zou, S. (2025). AI-empowered English language test development and administration: Innovation and prospects. Foreign Language World, (3), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.26971/j.cnki.flw.1004-5112.2025.03.009

[29] Wang, H., & Jin, Y. (2026). A study on learner engagement with feedback in AI-assisted diagnostic oral assessment. Modern Foreign Languages, 49(3), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.20071/j.cnki.xdwy.20260209.007

[30] Xu, Y., Zhang, B., & Li, X. (2026). Practice and reflection on the application of artificial intelligence in large-scale oral English assessments. Foreign Language Research, (1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.16263/j.cnki.23-1071/h.2026.01.011

[31] Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290601081332

[32] Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Springer.

[33] Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383328

[34] Sweller, J. (2024). Cognitive load theory and individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, 102423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102423

[35] Kamelabad, A. M., Turano, B., Lundin, M., & Skantze, G. (2026). Personalized language learning with an LLM chatbot: Effects of immediate vs. delayed corrective feedback. Frontiers in Education, 11, Article 1703664. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1703664

[36] Wang, H. (2026). Exploring AI-empowered college English teaching based on the human-centered concept. Foreign Languages in China, 23(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2026.01.001

[37] Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

[38] Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

[39] Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

[40] Yang, L. (2024). Second language acquisition in the context of large language model of ChatGPT. Modern Foreign Languages, 47(4), 578–585. https://doi.org/10.20071/j.cnki.xdwy.20240523.003

[41] Wen, X. (2025). Robot teachers in future foreign language education: Opportunities and challenges. Foreign Languages in China, 22(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2025.01.006

[42] Gu, L., & Wang, Q. (2025). Hidden concerns in human-machine dialogue: Data privacy risks and trust mechanisms in large language models. Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China), (6), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.19997/j.cnki.xdcb.2025.06.006

[43] Gao, M., Liu, J., & Yang, Z. (2024). Philosophical reflection on the risk of network opinion polarization under the intervention of ChatGPT. Journal of South China University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 26(4), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.19366/j.cnki.1009-055X.2024.04.003

[44] Wang, Y. (2023). A study on the factors influencing the behavioral intention of college students using artificial intelligence technology to assist in mobile learning of English vocabulary. Modern Distance Education, (5), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.20231218.001

[45] Zou, B., & Wang, C. (2026). Exploring pathways of university students' personalised English-speaking learning using generative AI. Foreign Language Research, (1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.16263/j.cnki.23-1071/h.2026.01.010

[46] Yang, L., & Li, S. (2025). The cultivation of foreign language education postgraduates in the era of artificial intelligence. China University Teaching, (4), 14–21.

Downloads

Published

02-07-2026

How to Cite

Wu, J. (2026). AI-Empowered English Speaking Teaching and Learning: A Scoping Review of Chinese Core Journal Studies (2022–2026). Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 16, 147-155. https://doi.org/10.62051/bdwbk164